Estimated reading time: 31 minutes

Greetings, Wayfinders and Seekers! You are about to see nine major American historical moments—like the Civil War and Pearl Harbor—explained in a clear, almost perfect timeline. We solve the biggest problem facing in astrology: figuring out which US chart is real. The famous Sibley chart is known for showing fear for failure and internal fights, but the rectified Quigley chart shows the US as a nation of decisive action and success.

These are the last 3 articles for the comparison between the Quigley chart and the Sibley chart. In this article, I show once again with nine examples from American history that the Quigley chart is the correct USA birth chart.

This is a follow-up on my research between the Quigley USA Natal chart and the US Sibley chart (which is not the USA natal chart) as I have explained here.

In this main article we’ve summed up the explanations and come to conclusions.

You can find the Quigley Directions & Progressions here and the Sibley Direction & Progressions here which are part of this series.

We will use Directions and Secondary Progressions for this. In fact, by rectifying the Quigley chart by 1 minute and 42 seconds, we see an astonishing chronological sequence emerge with events in American history. This provides the Quigley Chart’s Chronological Proof.

I also tried to rectify the Sibley chart, but I run into problems over and over again. I’ve tried several, but with none of these rectifications we get the 9 events mentioned in this article aligned.

Each translated aspect also has a brief explanation. If you read through the different storylines of the Quigley and the Sibley map, does that correspond to the information you know from the USA?

The Directions and Progressions for the Sibley map are very extensive and span several years for the first three chapters with their most important aspects. There is a need to do this so extensively, as the Sibley chart has been used by astrologers as an official birth chart for 250 years. Now that we find out that the Sibley chart is not the correct birth chart, we cannot prove with just a few aspects that the Sibley chart would not be the birth chart. Therefore, extensive periods have been deciphered to prove this theorem. We will come to a surprising conclusion about the Sibley card at the end!

Rectifying the Quigley chart:

When we rectify the original Quigley chart (03:03 AM) by 1 minute and 42 seconds to 03:04:42 AM, we see the following data between 1787 and 1944 ligning up.

Moment 1-3: U.S. Constitution 1787 – 1789

The Quigley Chart’s Chronological Proof: (U.S. Constitution)

Quigley Chart 3 Events for US Constitution:

• July 31, 1787: Explanation: Stopping cooperation poses risks in the balance of power.
• August 2, 1787: Explanation: By being faithful and loyal to a vision of the future with the group that wants freedom and independence, recovery of one’s own territory is possible.
• August 25, 1787: Explanation: This brings sudden changes in the society of the nation, possibly rebellious/revolt or innovative insights.
• Moment 1: September 17, 1787 U.S. Constitution Signed by 39 delegates
• September 19, 1787: Explanation: Here we see a transformation/major change of goals within the nation, which is related to joint legal judgments, such as a constitution. This may well be the signature by the various states.
• June 20, 1788: Explanation: Here they actively fight/work to protect the population, so that family and possessions can be enjoyed.
• Moment 2: June 21, 1788 Ratification Constitution, after New Hampshire became the ninth state
• Moment 3: March 4, 1789 Official start date new government under the Constitution
• March 5, 1789: Explanation: Here we see sudden changes in their own country/identity that are taken quickly and with a lot of decisiveness. The group (Ura/Gemini) fights for freedom and independence through innovation/modernization of communication or actions (agreements). This can be an act to ratify a document (march in Gemini).

Now, let’s see what the Sibley story is telling us:

Sibley chart 3 Events for US Constitution:

• May 7, 1787: Explanation: There are dreams that give disillusionment about the transformation/changes by destroying valuable relationships, houses and the people.
• May 30, 1787: Explanation: Having confidence in expanding borders or legal judgments in one’s own country offers opportunities with like-minded people.
• July 4, 1787: Explanation: Recognizing the change of one’s own identity comes together with the condition of protecting the people.
• July 30, 1787: Explanation: There are negotiations with leaders in which one’s own identity is transformed/changed/terminated.
• August 5, 1787: Explanation: Recognizing leadership through shared values/appreciation in protecting the people.
• September 14, 1787: Explanation: Here we see a need to fight against opponents of one’s own identity, which leads to conflicts with those who want to remain free and independent.
• Moment 1: September 17, 1787 U.S. Constitution Signed by 39 delegates
• September 17, 1787: Explanation: Here, the parties want to be able to decide independently and independently who is a friend and who is an opponent. This leads to considerable confusion/disappointment among valuable relations and the people about the shared values. (The confusion does not look like the signing of an important constitution. Possibly an underlying feeling among part of the population / valuable relations.)
• August 7, 1787: Explanation: Goals with a vision of the future that focus on faith and trust in one’s own identity and one’s own leadership offer opportunities to create friendships / make legal agreements.
• October 4, 1787: Explanation: Showing common goals in public life brings the opportunity for a change in judgments (Virgo) in important/valuable relationships.
• November 7, 1787: Explanation: Showing these independent partnerships leads to tensions in communication.
• November 20, 1787: Explanation: The population in their own country experiences shocking changes with strategic partners or opponents.
• November 20, 1787: Explanation: Here people mainly believe in their own identity/nationality and their loyalty and trust is entrusted to their own (personal) leader.
• November 28, 1787: Explanation: Recognition of change of identity/leadership to protect the people also leads to transformation/end of power by the original/traditional people.
• February 6, 1788: Explanation: The need to negotiate with opponents creates conflict with one’s own legal analyses and judgments in one’s own country and also leads to tensions in diplomatic judgments with friends.
• March 1, 1788: Explanation: Ideals that come together in legal contracts with friends. Can also be the concealment of disillusionment / disappointment about judgments or agreements.
• March 2, 1788: Explanation: The changes in one’s own national/nationalistic identity cause problems with restoring/repairing one’s own territory.
• March 17, 1788: Explanation: The major changes lead to sudden insights/ modernization of communication/ media/ transport at the opposing party/ others.
• May 8, 1788: Explanation: Seeing diplomatic and strategic partnerships and the progress in communication and transport give an opportunity for confidence in agreements about borders.
• May 21, 1788: Explanation: The goals are focussed on protecting the people. This could be a signing by transforming/changing agreements.
• Moment 2: June 21, 1788 Ratification Constitution, after New Hampshire became the ninth state
• July 12, 1788: Explanation: These can be actions to transform/change one’s own identity and to officially acknowledge this.
• July 19, 1788: Explanation: The condition for the change is that the people and their common values (8th house) and moral standards (cancer) are protected.
• August 31, 1788: Explanation: Confidence in one’s own vision for one’s own country gives conflicts with opponents, which makes it necessary to fight either through negotiations or with war vehicles (Mars in Gemini).
• October 28, 1788: Explanation: The need to fight (secretly) for changes with strategic partners or opponents creates tensions.
• December 17, 1788: Explanation: Confusion, disappointment or frustration about ideals in one’s own country and public life about limited belief in one’s own identity.
• Moment 3: March 4, 1789 Official start date new government under the Constitution (Notice how far away in time this is for our last important aspect in December and the next aspect in May!)
• May 13, 1789: Explanation: The diplomatic relations that exist with friends cause tensions with (the giving up of/the change of) one’s own identity.
• June 21, 1789: Explanation: The confidence that one’s own identity can be maintained and expanded creates opportunities to form partnerships.
• July 4, 1789: Explanation: Confidence in a vision of the future with its own identity and leadership comes together with its own goals.
• July 25, 1789: Explanation: This involves shocking insights in which there is a need to take active action. This can be done by negotiation or by means of transport for war.
• September 7, 1789: Explanation: Here a damning judgment is made about the security of borders and the protection thereof, or a statement about a traditional authority being terminated or killed.
• November 14, 1789: Explanation: Blocking legal judgments/rulings or cooperation with strategic partnerships by destroying traditional authorities creates tensions.
• November 26, 1789: Explanation: The preference and condition is that the population is protected by merging/combining or sharing (Gemini) armies (Mars) or by active negotiations.
• December 2, 1789: Explanation: The goals of one’s own identity and leadership and the trust in it, ensure that the recovery of one’s own territory goes smoothly.
• December 15, 1789: Explanation: Here the structuring/consolidation of diplomatic relations is shown.

Quigley Chart Summary: The Quigley Chart’s Chronological Proof

The Quigley chart emphasizes a three-part process leading to the new US government, focusing on themes of cooperation, loyalty, and sudden, decisive action. The signing of the Constitution on September 17, 1787, is framed by a need to avoid stopping cooperation and a subsequent transformation of national goals related to legal judgments, eventualy the states’ signatures. The Ratification on June 21, 1788, is characterized by active efforts to protect the population so they can enjoy their family and possessions. Finally, the official start date on March 4, 1789, features “sudden changes” in national identity and freedom achieved through innovation and modernization of communication or agreements.

Sibley Chart Summary

The Sibley chart highlights a more contentious and identity-focused journey, marked by dreams, disillusionment, and internal conflict. The period before the signing includes concerns about disillusionment from transformations, a need to fight opponents of national identity, and recognizing leadership through shared values. The signing on September 17, 1787, is interpreted not as a harmonious event, but as a moment where parties independently decide friends/opponents, causing confusion and disappointment among the populace. Furthermore, subsequent events leading to the new government involve continued tensions, a need to fight with opponents over territory, where diplomatic relations causing problems for the national identity.

Key Differences Between the Quigley and Sibley Charts

The fundamental difference lies in their tone and interpretation of the key moments. The Quigley chart emphasizes constructive, unified, and positive actions like loyalty, fighting to protect the population, and achieving freedom through decisive change, suggesting a more successful or cooperative process. In contrast, the Sibley chart portrays a narrative of internal struggle, conflict, and confusion, highlighting disillusionment, the need to fight opponents, and the signing not looking like an important constitution signing due to underlying tensions. While Quigley focuses on cooperative action, Sibley focuses on conflict and challenges to the national identity throughout the process.

Moment 4: Start of the American Civil War 1861

American Civil War – Chronological Proof from the Quigley Chart

Quigley chart Start American Civil War:

• January 24, 1861: Explanation: Here, friends who want to be free and independent move actively/aggressively forward (warfare), but this causes disillusionment and disappointment at home. (as often happens in wars)
• January 30, 1861: Explanation: The friends who want to be independent have problems limiting the conflict. Mutual aggression causes conflict in diplomatic relations.
• March 9, 1861: Explanation: Here the people want change through solutions in public life to be able to dream and relax, or by sacrificing and letting go of dreams by destroying/killing concrete authorities.
• March 10, 1861: Explanation: Mars/Neptune tends (especially in an opposition) to conceal the truth, deceit and dishonesty. Causes great frustration and confusion. Aggression among friends is still concealed internally here (1 month before the start of the civil war).
• Moment 4: April 12, 1861 start of the Civil War
• April 14, 1861: Explanation: Here we see a trine, which is usually associated with happiness and good things. I have indicated before that it is mainly about an “easy flow”. Here we see that the Benefic Jupiter in a trine to Pluto (Jupiter/Pluto combination can make things very big) heralds the start of the civil war. In this aspect, the faith and confidence is found to bring about profound change/destruction in traditional structures and authorities.
• April 23, 1861: Explanation: The need to fight for safety & security brings opportunities.
• May 8, 1861: Explanation: The need to change by releasing or sacrificing can bring profound change
• May 8, 1861: Explanation: This causes great confusion/disappointment/chaos about one’s own identity and leadership by sacrificing valuable families, homes and natural resources.
• May 12, 1861: Explanation: Showing the sacrifice or abandonment of valuable financial security brings creates a lack of trust and hope for freedom and independence.
• June 29, 1861: Explanation: This moment is related to one’s own ideal image of the identity of the nation and its people.
• July 12, 1861: Explanation: Profound changes in the power and control of their own territory provides sudden insight or modernisation about their country.
• December 8, 1861: Explanation: Independent leaders who create tensions by destruction, death and disease.

Sibley chart Start American Civil War

• January 19, 1860: Explanation: The need to fight for one’s own territory and one’s own leaders creates conflict with diplomatic agreements and leads to tensions in one’s own country.
• January 22, 1860: Explanation: Not being able to protect the people/ powerless to protect from death by destroying valuable relationships (Venus), families and homes (Cancer) comes together here with destroying the cooperation to protect. This can be the termination/cancellation of a contract or agreement due to powerless feelings.
• January 29, 1860: Explanation: Wanting to fight aggressively for one’s own territory conflicts with the legal contracts and agreements that are shown.
• February 7, 1860: Explanation: Holding back/limiting safety (a lack of protection) creates tensions with the legal contracts and agreements.
• March 2, 1860: Explanation: Repairing that security and reliability in traditional authorities creates conflicts with the confidence in protecting the people.
• June 2, 1860: Explanation: Showing powerlessness over the destruction of houses and population creates tensions with agreements and legal judgments of friends.
• June 12, 1860: Explanation: Letting go of old ways of fighting for one’s own territory and leadership and focusing on goals to create diplomatic friendships creates tensions by destroying/changing traditional conservative authorities.
• June 20, 1860: Explanation: There is a lack of confidence to work together in public life/own country.
• September 10, 1860: Explanation: Strategic cooperation with partners who are not appreciated creates tension with the traditional statutes or traditional/original structure of the legal contracts and agreements.
• November 10, 1860: Explanation: Disappointment and disillusionment due to a lack of confidence in one’s own identity causes problems in public life.
• January 29, 1861: Explanation: Transformation/destruction or termination of leadership or self-identity creates great tensions.
• February 6, 1861: Explanation: The need to fight an opponent, but for which there is insufficient strength, brings the need to negotiate diplomatic relations.
• April 2, 1861: Explanation: Showing legal contracts/agreements creates the conscious will to fight for or against these agreements.
• Moment 4: April 12, 1861 start of the Civil War
• April 8, 1861: Explanation: Disappointment, deception about the ideals of working together in public life on the one hand and showing the destruction of houses and population on the other hand creates tensions.
• June 25, 1861: Explanation: Sudden changes or technological developments that are exciting or shocking for confidence in one’s own goals and identity.
• July 16, 1861: Explanation: Showing destruction to homes and population creates a need to communicate/negotiate.
• March 17, 1862: Explanation: Preference to be able to fight aggressively in one’s own territory when crossing the border leads to conflict due to concrete legal contracts/agreements
• August 19, 1862: Explanation: Stopping change makes the people feel limited and limited. Structuring protection provides valuable safety, security and reliability for the people.
• November 9, 1863: Explanation: The letting go/dissolving/disappearance of the interior (destruction) creates tension to fight against opponents in the region.

Quigley Chart Summary: Start of the Civil War

The Quigley chart describes the lead-up to the Civil War as a period where friends seeking freedom and independence move aggressively, which unfortunately causes disillusionment and disappointment at home. Prior to the April 12, 1861, start date, there was a theme of concealing the truth, deception, and internal aggression among friends, leading to frustration and confusion. The Civil War’s start itself is “positively” highlighted by a Jupiter-Pluto trine, which signifies a significant “easy flow” where faith and confidence are found to bring about profound change and destruction of traditional authorities. Subsequent events continue the theme of active fighting for security, sacrificing for change, and confusion about the national identity due to the devastation of families and resources.

Sibley Chart Summary: Start of the Civil War

The Sibley chart portrays the pre-war period (starting in 1860) as being dominated by a deep lack of security and powerlessness concerning the protection of people, homes, and valuable relationships, leading to conflicts with diplomatic and legal agreements. Key themes include the need to fight for territory and leaders, a termination/cancellation of contracts due to a feeling of powerlessness, and a general lack of confidence to work together in public life. Leading up to the April 12, 1861, start date, there is disappointment and disillusionment about national identity, culminating in a focus on the conscious will to fight for or against existing legal agreements. Post-start events include sudden and shocking technological changes and a persistent need to communicate and negotiate, stemming from the destruction of homes and the population.

Key Differences Between the Quigley and Sibley Charts

The primary difference lies in the timing and the nature of the crisis. The Quigley chart’s focus is much tighter on the immediate months before the start of the war (January-March 1861) and interprets the war’s onset with the high-energy, change-making Jupiter-Pluto trine. Conversely, the Sibley chart’s narrative begins much earlier (January 1860), highlighting a year of deteriorating national function, focusing on the inability to protect citizens and the outright cancellation of contracts/agreements. Ultimately, Quigley frames the start as a moment of profound, decisive, and destructive change, while Sibley frames it as the inevitable result of a year-long systemic failure marked by powerlessness and broken cooperation.

Moment 5-7: End of the Civil War 1865 – 1866

Quigley Events 5-7 End of the Civil War:

• March 18, 1865: Explanation: Hygiene and health care during/immediately after a war are usually very poor. The sacrifice (Neptune) of keeping slaves (virgo) and releasing (Neptune) slaves into one’s own country/”management” (4th house) was an important part of the civil war.
• April 2, 1865: Explanation: Apparently there are negotiations going on here, which makes repair and the restoration of one’s own territory/territory possible.
• April 9, 1865: Explanation: Protection is no longer possible here, which greatly increases the risk of destruction. Ending power through authority brings surrender.
• April 10, 1865: Explanation: Protection that is destroyed/terminated/killed. Creating protection for the people is not appreciated here (saturn + 2nd house are also about appreciation, the opposition destroys that appreciation here) and leads to the destruction of a traditional authority.
• Moment 5: April 15, 1865 Assassination Abraham Lincoln
• April 20, 1865: Explanation: This may be associated with April 15 / assassination of Lincoln, but could also be April 26 / surrender Joseph E. Johnston. There is tension among the people due to a lack of faith and trust in friends who want to be free and independent. This is an emotional experience due to a lack of confidence in independence.
• Moment 6: April 26, 1865 Surrender Joseph E. Johnston
• May 8, 1865: Explanation: Strong preference for strategic partnership by concrete contract/ agreements, which is highly appreciated.
• August 1, 1866: Explanation: There are opportunities to make agreements in the region that suddenly brings progress.
• Moment 7: August 20, 1866 Formal end of civil war.
• August 31, 1866: Explanation: Life with friends is no longer focused on communication and negotiations in the region (3rd house) but on orderly and healthy cooperation, through fixed rhythms and patterns (all virgo) in one’s own interior (4th house) for scientific research into technical developments (virgo).

Sibley Events 5-7 End of the Civil War:

• March 24, 1864: Explanation: Discoveries are made by opponents that are shocking in public life and for their own identity. This may refer to trading slaves (Virgo and Gemini).
• May 16, 1864: Explanation: The need to resolve the struggle by letting go of historical dreams (4th house) or releasing prisoners (pisces) gives shocked reactions to contacts in the region. Could possibly refer to slaves/prisoners again.
• June 5, 1864: Explanation: Life and identity in both domestic and public life “dissolve/disappear” or are “dissolved”. There is great confusion about the sacrifice of cooperation.
• August 19, 1864: Explanation: The need to solve on the one hand or to let go of dreams on the other leads to tensions about one’s own identity.
• September 6, 1864: Explanation: Confidence in legal judgments or agreements with friends/allies is shown.
• January 3, 1865: Explanation: Profound change of power and control through impotent surrender or sacrifice creates tensions with the goals for one’s own identity and leadership.
• January 16, 1865: Explanation: The structural appointment of a traditional authority for the protection of security brings confidence to the people. Preventing protection by traditional authority creates a lack of confidence among the people.
• March 23, 1865: Explanation: Recognizing one’s own leadership in one’s own territory offers opportunities with suddenly changing insights among strategic partners/opponents.
• April 11, 1865: Explanation: Can be very idealistic in communication or negotiations, but can also cause confusion, disillusionment or deception about one’s own identity and goals in one’s own country.
• Moment 5: April 15, 1865 Assassination Abraham Lincoln
• Moment 6: April 26, 1865 Surrender Joseph E. Johnston
• April 27, 1865: Explanation: Disappointment and disillusionment due to cross-border activities with strategic partners or opponents.
• July 6, 1865: Explanation: Goals to work together in a valuable way for concrete safety and security of physical health in public life go well together.
• October 9, 1865: Explanation: The deliberate necessity to sacrifice the domestic domain through struggle causes confusion and disappointment in public life. The need to surrender or the need to sacrifice slaves.
• February 23, 1866: Explanation: (The fear of = Pisces in 4) sacrificing one’s own identity gives shocked / rebellious communication / actions with partners.
• March 24, 1866: Explanation: Destructive communications or acts of power and control within one’s own territory.
• April 13, 1866: Explanation: The deliberate necessity to sacrifice the interior through struggle causes confusion and disappointment in public life. The need to surrender or the need to sacrifice slaves, now as a judgment or statement.
• May 15, 1866: Explanation: Confusion and disappointment about dreams and ideals regarding cooperation in public life and confidence in expanding borders in one’s own country.
• Moment 7: August 20, 1866 Formal end of civil war.
• October 24, 1866: Explanation: Disappointment and disillusionment in cooperation with partners creates conflict with legal judgments and borders in one’s own country and creates tensions in public life in the cooperation.

Quigley Chart Summary: End of the Civil War

The Quigley chart links the end of the war to the major issue of slavery and freedom, noting that poor hygiene/healthcare and the sacrifice of freeing slaves into the country were important parts of the final phase. The surrender of the Confederacy is characterized by the cessation of protection on April 9th, which increases the risk of destruction and ends power through authority. The assassination of Lincoln (Moment 5) causes tension and a lack of faith among the people regarding friends who desire freedom and independence. In addition, the formal end (Moment 7) transitions the nation’s focus away from regional communication and negotiation toward orderly, healthy, and fixed cooperation, emphasizing scientific research and technical developments within the nation’s interior.

Sibley Chart Summary: End of the Civil War

The Sibley chart portrays the final years of the war (beginning in 1864) as a time of profound confusion, disappearance, and sacrifice. The lead-up to the end involves shocking discoveries by opponents, the “dissolution” of life and identity, and great confusion over the sacrifice of cooperation. The period surrounding the assassination and surrender is marked by disappointment and disillusionment concerning cross-border activities and the structural appointment of authority creating or preventing protection. Moreover, long after the surrenders, the Sibley chart emphasizes the deliberate necessity to sacrifice the interior through struggle and a growing disappointment in cooperation, leading to ongoing conflict with legal judgments and borders into late 1866.

Key Differences Between the Quigley and Sibley Charts

The main contrast is in the focus of the post-war adjustment and the emotional toll. The Quigley chart offers a relatively immediate shift towards structure and modernization after the formal end (August 1866), suggesting a path forward based on technical/scientific cooperation and orderly patterns. The Sibley chart, however, emphasizes a persistent, protracted period of confusion, disillusionment, and struggle, with the “sacrifice of the internal domain” and disappointment in cooperation continuing to cause conflicts in public life and legal judgments well after the formal end date. In short, Quigley focuses on the new, orderly beginning, while Sibley highlights the lingering sacrifice and psychological struggle inherent in the transition.

Moment 8: Attack on Pearl Harbor – Quigley Chart Chronological Proof in WWII

• December 22, 1941: Explanation: The dream of safety and protection is easily dissolved by destruction of structures.
• December 25, 1941: Explanation: A social “answer” to the bombing is being sought. This involves in-depth research into power and control/powerlessness over destruction in public life. Concrete goals and the development of the answer are hidden (in 1945 it will become clear what has been developed)
• December 29, 1941: Explanation: Because boundaries have been crossed (both physical national borders and moral boundaries) one’s own independence is abandoned (as a result of which the USA became involved in the second world war), but this gives conflict with the nation’s own goal to remain true and loyal to itself and its own identity/leaders.

Sibley Moment 8:

• June 21, 1940: Explanation: The authorities’ demonstration of certainty about the safety of income and assets comes together with the destruction of concrete traditional, conservative authority.
• June 24, 1940: Explanation: Shocked disillusionment about cross-border activities on their own territory due to sudden and unexpected uprising/rebellion of opponents.
• June 27, 1940: Explanation: Here there is confusion/disappointment about sacrificing one’s own country or identity.
• September 12, 1940: Explanation: Disillusionment due to aggressive activities on their own territory.
• April 19, 1941: Explanation: The need to fight for one’s own country and identity causes confusion and frustration among sacrificial families in the interior.
• Moment 8: December 7, 1941 Attack on Pearl Harbor
• December 11, 1941: Explanation: The need to fight/fight for concrete security through tensions with the boundaries of friends/allies.
• December 26, 1941: Explanation: Limited confidence (Jupiter in Fall) in structural protection and security brings the need to fight by war vehicles (possibly by the air/air element).
• June 16, 1942: Explanation: The need to fight for safety causes problems with stopping opponents.

Quigley Chart Summary: Pearl Harbor

The Quigley chart emphasizes the attack on Pearl Harbor (Moment 8) as an event preceded by a life-altering meeting with “extreme destruction,” directly linking it to the profound destruction of the nation’s life or identity. Immediately following the attack, the focus shifts to joint cleaning and tidying up the interior after these major changes. The subsequent days are marked by an emotional experience of shocked disbelief and a lack of confidence in protecting the people, alongside the dissolution of the dream of safety. Crucially, the chart notes that a secret “societal answer” to the bombing is sought through in-depth research into power and control, a goal that remained hidden until 1945.

Sibley Chart Summary: Pearl Harbor

The Sibley chart places the Pearl Harbor attack within a much longer context of escalating national insecurity starting as early as June 1940. This preceding period involves the destruction of traditional authority, shocked disillusionment over cross-border activities, and confusion about sacrificing national identity. The chart notes disillusionment due to aggressive activities on US territory, and the need to fight for identity causing frustration among sacrificial families. Following the December 7th attack (Moment 8), the focus immediately turns to the need to fight for concrete security, encountering problems with the boundaries of friends/allies and a limited confidence in structural protection.

Key Differences Between the Quigley and Sibley Charts

The main difference lies in temporal scope and the strategic outcome. The Quigley chart’s pre-event period is highly focused on the immediate destructive force of the attack (December 6th/7th) and frames the outcome as a secret, strategic mobilization (the “societal answer” developed until 1945). In contrast, the Sibley chart presents the attack as the climax of a continuous process of territorial and diplomatic violation. While Quigley emphasizes the immediate internal response and a secret strategic answer, Sibley focuses on the external pressures, ongoing confusion, and the continued struggle for security with allies’ boundaries post-attack.

Moment 9: Atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Quigley Moments 9a, b & c:

• July 7, 1945: Explanation: The internal destruction of one’s own interior and the insecurity in one’s own country offers opportunities with the preferential / condition to protect the people and their homes.
• August 2, 1945: Explanation: Destroying security and protection brings profound change in power of control to protect the people.
• Moment 9a: August 6, 1945 bombs on Hiroshima.
• August 7, 1945: Explanation: Restoring a righteous judgment easily goes hand in hand with letting go of international friends (or enemies!) and like-minded people. This was “Little Boy” that was released over Hiroshima.
• Moment 9b: August 9, 1945 bombs on Nagasaki.
• August 14, 1945: Explanation: The disappearance / dissolution of empathy in public life (with regard to Japan) due to confusion / disappointment / disillusionment (after the attack Pearl Harbor 1941 and the rest of the war) suddenly gives shocking / rebellious freedom through modernization of communication or means of transport in our own country. This is related to the “Fat Man” bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki.
• Moment 9c: August 15, 1945 capitulation Japan
• August 15, 1945: Explanation: This is the emotional reaction of the population to the reaction of the USA to the bombing of Japan, which are seen as just targets.
• August 15, 1945: Explanation: They experience a happy and satisfied feeling about their own actions.
• September 1, 1945: Explanation: This brings a great sense of happiness and contentment with regard to protecting/recovering/healing (Jupiter) of valuable safety and security.
• Moment 9a: August 6, 1945 bombs on Hiroshima.
• September 3, 1945: Explanation: The people can retreat and relax (12th house/ Taurus/Moon exalted) by solutions for the reliability of their security (after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki).

Sibley Moments 9a, b & c:

• July 4, 1944: Explanation: Aggressive activities on their own territory are not desirable and cause tensions with opponents and their unjust judgments.
• August 17, 1944: Explanation: Shocked confusion by sudden inventions of opponents that cause chaos.
• November 19, 1944: Explanation: Transformation or destruction of one’s own identity or leadership through power and control to protect the people from death or fear of it.
• December 1, 1944: Explanation: Fear and powerlessness among the population due to the destruction of security.
• December 12, 1944: Explanation: Letting go of powerlessness through in-depth research into concrete goals aimed at secretly killing the population.
• May 7, 1945: Explanation: The need to restore/repair one’s own territory.
• May 10, 1945: Explanation: Protecting/building up one’s own territory gives a change with diplomatic friends.
• June 23, 1945: Explanation: The condition for being able to enjoy and have fun is related to confidence in one’s own identity.
• August 8, 1945: Explanation: Disillusionment and disappointment due to sudden shocking changes in opponents or strategic partners.
• Moment 9b: August 9, 1945 bombs on Nagasaki.
• Moment 9c: August 15, 1945 capitulation Japan
• August 31, 1945: Explanation: Aggressive activities and the destruction of assets, finances and natural resources creates tensions.
• August 31, 1945: Explanation: Showing aggressive activities shows the need to restore one’s own leadership in one’s own territory.
• September 27, 1945: Explanation: Shocked or rebellious relationships/emotions due to conflict between traditional authority on the one hand and the preference/condition for in-depth research into the killing/ending of relationships, homes and the people on the other.

Quigley Chart Summary: End of WWII

The Quigley chart describes the events leading to the surrender as a period where the internal destruction and insecurity within the US offer opportunities to protect the people and their homes. The bombings (9a & 9b) are framed by the destruction of security and a profound change in the power of control, with the Hiroshima bomb enabling a “righteous judgment” that easily allows the US to let go of international friends or enemies. The Nagasaki bomb’s impact leads to the sudden disappearance of empathy in public life regarding Japan, which is linked to a shocking, rebellious freedom through modernization of communication or transport in the US. Consequently, the immediate aftermath and the capitulation (9c) are marked by a happy, satisfied emotional reaction from the US population, who feel contentment regarding their actions and the ultimate recovery of valuable safety and security.

Sibley Chart Summary: End of WWII

The Sibley chart views the final events as a culmination of earlier fears, with a prolonged period starting in 1944 focusing on destruction, fear, and powerlessness among the population due to insecurity. The pre-bombing period emphasizes the letting go of powerlessness through in-depth research aimed at secretly killing the population (December 1944) and the need to restore the nation’s own territory. Following the bombings (9a & 9b), the immediate reactions focus on disillusionment and disappointment due to sudden, shocking changes in opponents or strategic partners. Furthermore, the post-capitulation period (9c) highlights aggressive activities and the destruction of assets, showing a continued need to restore US leadership and a lingering, emotional conflict concerning traditional authority versus the in-depth research into killing and ending relationships.

Quigley Chart: Conclusion

The Quigley chart generally presents US historical moments with an emphasis on decisive action, successful transitions, and positive, forward-looking outcomes. Key events are framed by the necessity of cooperation, loyalty, and achieving profound, albeit destructive, change in pursuit of security and freedom. After periods of conflict, the chart highlights the population’s quick move toward satisfaction, structure, and modernization, as seen in the scientific focus after the Civil War and the secret, successful “societal answer” to Pearl Harbor. Ultimately, this chart interprets major national events as necessary steps toward achieving internal order and a unified, progressive national goal.

Sibley Chart: Conclusion

The Sibley chart consistently interprets US historical moments through a lens of conflict, emotional struggle, confusion, and systemic failure. Its narratives often focus on prolonged periods of disillusionment, powerlessness, and the violation of diplomatic or legal agreements that precede pivotal moments. The chart frequently highlights the cost to the American people, emphasizing themes like the destruction of homes and the psychological burden, suggesting a deeper, more painful internal experience during times of crisis.

Therefore, the Sibley chart portrays the nation’s history as a continuous, conflicted process of fighting for identity and security against both internal and external challenges, even after the formal conclusion of wars.

Final Conclusions & Wrapping Up

We spoke earlier about the USA “two party system” with Democrats and Republicans, which is very much Gemini. We have also seen that the Gemini Rising chart had a Mars which was only 30 minutes way from the ascendant. In the rectified version this is only 6 minutes! This brings strong powers in the life of the USA. But how about those 2 charts, Quigley & Sibley? Also very much Twins/ Gemini, even in their names! It’s extra proof of the Gemini Ascendant for the US. Although Quigley is the natal chart, the Sibley energy is (also) widely available in the USA. With that, the task for the USA is to bind those forces together, not to split both parties! They need eachother, like Yin and Yang!

Ultimately, I think we’ve proven the Quigley chart is the map that tracks history. Furthermore, it shows a nation capable of decisive, progressive action, aligning with major historical milestones through success and unification. However, the Sibley energy—the confusion, the conflict, the disillusionment—is still a huge part of the American story, especially in its two-party system.

Remember: this is the great challenge. The Quigley and Sibley energies are the Twins of Gemini! They need each other, like Yin and Yang. Consequently, the future of the US depends on binding these two forces together, not letting them tear the nation apart! This duality is the true Quigley Chart’s Chronological Proof.

Which story feels more like America to you? Does the US succeed through easy teamwork or through endless internal fighting? Consequently, is America’s path forward about working together or staying divided?

Let’s work together; view my Coaching and Therapy price list.

Take a look at our Monthly Mundane Forecast, or are you more interested in another Rectified Chart? For more Mundane Astrology check the:

• Ukraine Birth chart
• European Union
• Russia Birth chart